Whether having three players offside (technically) when the shot was delivered and one (Gouffran), who had to bend his body to avoid being hit by it, adds up to enough for the referee to disallow seems to have carved the football gliteratti right down the middle. I cannot respond objectively as it involves Manchester City, but Gouffran's position and movement away from the arc of the shot surely effects the goalkeeper, who will have to prepare for two possibilities: a shot rocketing in a straight line past him into the far corner or a ricochet into the near post side of his goal. These are normal callibrations that a goalkeeper must make at every free kick and set play, Hart was making them about Gouffran, who was in an offside position. Thus, whilst not obstructing the goalkeeper, he is affecting Hart's decision-making process from an illegal position and thus having an influence on the proceedings. Having said that, goals like this often stand. City alone fell to at least three borderline legal goals in the early season games with Cardiff and Aston Villa, but little steam was let off then. What is good for the goose is good for the Pardew.
Strangely for most of us, City, suddenly accepted as part of the elite, are -it should be said at this point- getting many more favourable shouts than would have been the case five or six years ago. What the Kippax faithful always bleated about the top teams getting many more borderline decisions in their favour appears to be at work in the opposite direction at last.
From this point on, referee Mike Jones had only flimsy control of the match. Samir Nasri's injury came about through a clumsy challenge from yet another player losing his self control. The ball had left the scene, the usual shirt and arm tugging had proved ineffective in halting the departing Nasri, so Yanga Mbiwa chose to swing a petulant leg at Nasri's knee. As it is ridiculous to issue a red card for the resultant harm done, yellow sufficed, but red was certainly the colour of the mist that was descending all around us. The foul was not a bad one, but it mirrored beautifully the lack of control, the lack of respect, the lack of grace that was by now all around us.
Pellegrini: Old even when he was young |
As the match drew to a tired but compelling close, the steaming, snorting indignation of the Geordie Nation flowing in rivers off the terraces, one knew the resilience and spirit shown by City to depart this venue with the points would be buried beneath the carping and bubbling that these days traditionally follows such an encounter. That the home side had produced such an impressive performance themselves will also be lost in the thud of expletives that followed. City had been battered in more ways than one: by a resourceful and willing Newcastle side playing good flowing and aggressive football, by a wall of indignant noise from the Gallowgate choir and by a running succession of petulant unpunished fouls. The gifted Cabaye managed to remain on the pitch only because referee Jones had done enough damage to Newcastle self esteem for one afternoon. Constant transgression by this player in particular during an ill-mannered second half, each foul followed by the raised arms of the innocent and the mock frustration at the fouled player's seeming play acting, seemed to go wholly unnoticed by the referee and his by now flummoxed assistants. Add to that a yellow card for Zabaleta, who swung at Santon, missed so completely as to be laughable, only to see the Italian flip himself onto the grass three paces further on and we had been treated to a little bit of everything by the end.
Battered and bruised, City make for the top of the table, a sterling and professional performance overshadowed by the ugly, the wretched and the foul-mouthed.
Excellent, Simon. But I would take issue with you about the challenge on Samir being 'clumsy'. It was not; it was both entirely pointless and downright vicious, consisting of two hacks at the departing player with no hope of getting the ball. But yes, the main attributes of the match - Newcastle's skill and determination in taking the game to us after we'd scored and City's professionalism and resilience were and will be overshadowed by 'Cuntgate'.
ReplyDeleteWhat a very good summary of the whole grubby afternoon, Simon. You're right, we do seem to now be benefiting from favourable decisions, although the odd poor one has also surfaced lately (Swansea)
ReplyDeleteI thought our discipline was admirable in the face of the Newcastle approach and the weak refereeing, and I'm surprised not more has been made of this by the press.
I do slightly disagree with you on the tackle that caused Nasri's injury - I thought it was very poor, as it was the second swipe that did the damage.
All in all, a very commendable, but costly, victory.
You make good, valid points about the disallowed goal. I have to say that if the boot had have been on the other foot, and it was a shot from one of ours going past Krul, I wouldn't have felt aggrieved if it had been chalked off. Yes, those calls can go the other way, but I think on the balance of the evidence the correct decision was made: three players offside, the ball going across goal behind two of them, and in front of one who is standing close to the keeper and who dodges it. And despite what Pardew says about it being "top corner" and "unstoppable", it really was only chest height and well within diving range of Hart. who was definitely distracted by the presence (and movement) of Gouffran. It was just disgraceful the way the Newcastle players and manager responded to what they perceived as an injustice. Perhaps their outrage helped them mentally, to take the game to City in the second half, but it was ugly the way it manifested itself in the number of fouls and bad tackles, and Pardew as to take responsibility for that. And his verbal attack on Pellegrini! What a lunatic! I used to have a real soft spot for Newcastle and their fans; my opinion has hardened a little.
ReplyDelete